Cities are defined by their skylines — while Paris is composed mostly of low-rise apartment buildings, New York is a city of tall office towers. But London is a city in transition. On Tuesday, Boris Johnson, the mayor of the British capital, attends a "topping out" ceremony for one of London's latest skyscrapers in a city where tall buildings cause a lot of controversy.

Until recently, London has been a low-rise city.
 Even now, a 12-story building is considered rather tall.
 But a spate of new skyscrapers is raising questions about the kind of city London should be.

The newest entrant is a building Londoners have dubbed the "Cheese-Grater." It's an unfinished, 52-story steel frame that looks, well, like a cheese grater. One entire facade of the building tapers down to the street at such a sharp angle, it just calls out for a block of English cheddar. Once complete, it will be London's second-tallest building.

Nigel Webb of British Land, the developer, says the building is designed so its smaller top doesn't obstruct the view of St. Paul's Cathedral, built by Christopher Wren in the 17th century. The church is many blocks away, but views of the building from around the city are protected by law.

"Had we designed the building so that it was like a traditional tower going straight up, it would have actually clashed with the dome of St. Paul's," says Webb.

This gets at why skyscrapers can be so difficult to build in London: The city boasts centuries of architectural history, and some observers are very worried about its changing skyline.

"You know nowadays, the landscape of London is completely transformed — has somehow burst into a kind of small Shanghai," says Francesco Bandarin of UNESCO, the United Nations' cultural organization for conserving world heritage. "But these changes have limits."

Bandarin says London's new skyscrapers threaten another important, London landmark, the Tower of London, which sits right in the shadow of the city's new buildings. Built by William the Conqueror in the 11th century, the tower oozes British history: A couple of Henry VIII's wives lost their heads here; it's home to the Crown Jewels. 
 


UNESCO designates the Tower of London an official World Heritage Site, and Bandarin says it has warned the British government about the new development around it.

"We see now that it's very difficult to perceive the tower as it was in its very long millenary history because of the existence of these high-rise buildings," says Bandarin.

The British government is in talks with UNESCO to preserve what's left of the area. But Paul Finch, a critic at Architects' Journal, is concerned by what he says is the implication that instead of just preserving views of the Tower of London, UNESCO is urging the city to protect what visitors see from it. 


"The idea that we're going to start protecting views from these historic monuments and places is a form of madness," says Finch. "There is a danger of ending up with great swaths of a city, which cannot accommodate taller buildings."


Heated battles have already erupted. John Penrose, a former government minister for heritage in the U.K., is in favor of development. But he says The Shard — the tall, glass, spike-shaped building that now dominates the London skyline — was nearly scrapped because of conservationists' concerns over the Tower of London. And he has his own concerns.

"In the worst case," says Penrose, "UNESCO could withdraw the designation of being a World Heritage Site." 


That's something the organization has done only once in Europe, when Dresden built a bridge UNESCO said degraded the views around the German city.
 


In London's defense, Edward Lister, the city's deputy mayor for planning, says all of the new high-rises are essential for London to maintain its status as a global financial center.

"UNESCO is taking a very, very black-and white-position, and I'm afraid life's not like that," says Lister. "You cannot allow development to be stalled in a city like this. London's grown by 600,000 people in just the last five years. And we will be over 9 million people before New York. That's the pressure that the city's under." 


Nevertheless, London has come up with new guidelines as a result of the furor over the city's building boom. Known as "The London Plan," it protects more views across the city. But some tourists at the Tower of London look up at the surrounding walls of glass and kind of like it. 


"I think it shows how beautiful time was back in the 11th century, and just how beautiful the new creations are now in the 21st century," says Vanessa Lawson, visiting London from the nearby town of Hastings. "You know we kind of have to accept changes and go with them really."

And even more change is on the way. London has just approved proposals for tall buildings within view of another World Heritage Site, the Houses of Parliament, and UNESCO is concerned.

Copyright 2015 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

MELISSA BLOCK, HOST:

Cities are often defined by their skylines - Paris with its stately old buildings crowned by the Eiffel Tower, New York with its glittering forest of tall office towers. Well, the skyline of London is in transition. The British capital is experiencing a building boom of new skyscrapers. One of them, nicknamed The Shard, has become Europe's tallest building. But as Christopher Werth reports, the spate of skyscrapers is raising questions about what kind of city London should be.

CHRISTOPHER WERTH, BYLINE: London is very much a low-rise city. Even a 12-story building is considered tall here. But in recent years, new skyscrapers have begun to rise well above the skyline.

(SOUNDBITE OF MACHINERY)

NIGEL WEBB: We start to hear the noise of the hoist as we rise up.

WERTH: Nigel Webb and I climb aboard a construction elevator toward the top of an open, 52-story steel frame, London's second tallest building.

WEBB: So you'll get a good sense of the views, and you'll realize how low rise London is.

WERTH: Webb is with British Land, the developer of the structure that Londoners have dubbed the cheese grater.

WEBB: I think they just thought it looked like a cheese grater.

WERTH: And it does. One entire facade tapers down to the street at such a sharp angle the building just calls out for a block of English cheddar. Webb says it's designed so the smaller top doesn't obstruct the view of Saint Paul's cathedral built by Christopher Wren in the 17th century. The church is many blocks away, but views of it from around the city are protected by law.

WEBB: Had we designed the building so that it was like a traditional tower going straight up, it would have actually clashed with the dome of Saint Paul's.

WERTH: And this gets at why skyscrapers can be so difficult to build in London. The city boasts centuries of architectural history, and some people are very worried about its changing skyline.

FRANCESCO BANDARIN: You know, nowadays, the landscape of London is completely transformed, has somehow burst into a kind of a small Shanghai. But these changes have limits.

WERTH: Francesco Bandarin is with UNESCO, the United Nation's cultural organization for conserving world heritage. He says London's new skyscrapers threaten another important landmark.

(SOUNDBITE OF MARCHING)

WERTH: The Tower of London right in the shadow of the city's new buildings.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Present arms.

WERTH: The guards here protect the tower. Built by William the Conqueror in the 11th century, the place reeks of British history.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: God preserve Queen Elizabeth.

UNIDENTIFIED GROUP: Amen.

WERTH: A couple of Henry VIII's wives lost their heads here. It's home to the crown jewels. UNESCO designates the Tower of London an official World Heritage site. And Bandarin says it's warned the British government about the new development around it.

BANDARIN: We see now that it's very difficult to perceive the tower as it was in its very long millenary history because of the existence of these high-rise buildings.

WERTH: The British government is in talks with UNESCO to preserve what's left of the area. But Paul Finch, a critic at the Architects Journal, is concerned by the implication that instead of just preserving views of the Tower of London, the city is being urged to protect what you see from it.

PAUL FINCH: I think the idea that we're going start protecting views from these historic monuments and places is a form of madness. There is a danger of ending up with great swathes of a city which cannot accommodate taller buildings.

WERTH: Heated battles have already erupted. John Penrose, a former government minister for heritage in the U.K., is pro-development, but he says The Shard - the tall, glass, spike-shaped building that now dominates the London skyline - was nearly scrapped because of conservationists' concerns over the Tower of London. And he has his own concerns.

JOHN PENROSE: In the worst case, UNESCO could withdraw the designation of being a World Heritage site.

WERTH: Something it's only done once in Europe when Dresden, in Germany, built a bridge UNESCO says degraded the views around that city. But Edward Lister, London's deputy mayor for planning, says all of the new high-rises are essential for London to maintain its status as a global financial center.

EDWARD LISTER: UNESCO is taking a very, very black-and-white position, and I'm afraid life's not like that. You cannot allow development to be stalled in a city like this. London has grown by 600,000 people in just the last five years. And we will be over nine million people before New York. That's the pressure that the city is under.

WERTH: Nevertheless, London has come up with new guidelines as a result of the furor over the city's building boom. The plan protects more views across the city. But some tourists at the Tower of London, like Vanessa Lawson, look up at the surrounding walls of glass and kind of like it.

VANESSA LAWSON: I think it shows us how beautiful time was back in the 11th century and just how beautiful the new creations are now in the 21st century. You know, we kind of have to accept changes and go with them, really.

WERTH: And more change is on the way. London has just approved proposals for tall buildings within view of another World Heritage Site, the Houses of Parliament, and UNESCO is concerned. For NPR News, I'm Christopher Werth.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

You're listening to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

300x250 Ad

Support quality journalism, like the story above, with your gift right now.

Donate