A scientific discovery in Kenya, first reported in April, challenges conventional wisdom about human history, say the scientists who made the discovery and are now releasing the details. The scientists say the collection of stone tools they turned up near Lake Turkana were made long before the first humans are thought to have evolved.
This week the scientists unveil the details of their discovery in the journal Nature.
What's remarkable about the find is that, up until now, scientists widely believed that humans invented stone-tool making. In fact, anthropologists call the earliest humans Homo habilis -- meaning handy man.
The toolmaking technique associated with humans involves whacking rocks together in just the right way to fashion sharp tools. Until recently, the evidence — fossil bones and very old tools — has suggested this talent emerged about 2.5 million years ago.
But a team led by scientists from New York's Stony Brook University discovered stone tools that are much older than that, in a desert area west of Kenya's Lake Turkana. The tools are now in a museum in Nairobi.
Team leader Sonia Harmand says Sammy Lokorodi, a Kenyan goatherd and fossil hunter on the team, found the first stone tool on the surface. Harmand knew it was old but at first didn't quite know what they had.
"We were very, very excited," she says. "But at that time, we didn't know, at all, we were going to have these stone tools begin at 3.3. million years ago." That's hundreds of thousands of years before humans evolved from apelike ancestors.
Reliably confirming the age of this assemblage of stones was just the start. The researchers also had to prove that the sharp rocks had actually been crafted by hand and weren't just stones accidentally shaped like tools by natural forces — wind or water, for example.
"The jumping up and down lasted a couple of minutes in the field," says Jason Lewis, another archaeologist and member of the Stony Brook team. "We very quickly had to put our nose to the grindstone to put everything together to convince the rest of the world."
What convinced the team (and other scientists who have seen the tools) was the fact that there was a whole stone-tool-making kit right there — all in one place. The kit was just like the ones the first humans used; it included big core stones, flat anvil stones and sharp flakes.
To make a tool, you place the core stone on the anvil stone and strike it hard with another rock, Lewis says. Certain marks on the stones found in Kenya confirm they were manipulated this way.
"It's clear that the intention was to hit the stones together in such a way as to break off a series of sharp flakes," says Lewis.
And they found lots of these sharp flakes at the site. These are the "knives" of the Stone Age. They might have been used to cut meat off bone, or perhaps to cut up vegetable matter. In all, the team found more than 140 toolmaking artifacts at the site. While they weren't as sophisticated as tools that have been associated with the first humans, they were definitely crafted intentionally.
And at least one of the flakes actually fit perfectly into the grooves of one of the core stones. Harmand says that was the cherry on the cake — further evidence that someone had worked on these rocks at the site.
"The magic is being able to touch these stone tools for the first time, after 3.3 million years," she says.
So who made these tools? Certainly, chimpanzees can use stones as tools, to hammer and open nuts, for example. Chimps also fashion sticks to fish out termites from nests. But they don't manufacture stone tools like these.
The Stony Brook team says the maker of these tools might have been an apelike creature called Australopithecus, or perhaps a lesser known primate of the period, Kenyanthropus. Australopithecus is known from the famous fossil Lucy, about 4 feet tall, and living in trees, as well as on land.
But even if humans can no longer lay claim to inventing stone tools, it's worth considering whether toolmaking would have been a regular part of the Australopithecus skill set.
"The question, I think, is not could they have, but would they have done so repeatedly," says Erin Marie Williams-Hatala, a paleoanthropologist at Chatham University in Pittsburgh, who studies stone tools.
She says the wrists and hands of Australopithecus — which included long fingers and slender thumbs — were adapted to grasping tree branches. Sure, maybe these hands could also make tools, Williams-Hatala says, but it probably would have been a chore.
"And maybe," she says, "because it took them so long to do it, it didn't make sense for their subsistence strategy — for the way that they lived their lives."
Making tools probably didn't become a part of everyday life, she says, until the evolution of the first human hands, which had big strong thumbs that could connect with the fingertips in a tight grip and offered better fine motor control. Also, says Williams-Hatala, the human wrist is much more flexible in a way that enabled an efficient tool-cutting motion.
"When our hands and wrists changed to a sufficient degree," she says, "it began to make sense for our ancestors to engage in these behaviors in a new way, and probably more frequently" — maybe frequently enough to give humans an edge in the competition for survival.
Transcript
AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
Scientists working in Kenya have made a discovery that challenges conventional wisdom about human history. They found stone tools that were made before the first humans arrived on the scene. NPR's Christopher Joyce has more.
CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, BYLINE: The first humans had a handy talent. They whacked rocks together in just the right way to fashion sharp tools. In fact, scientists named the earliest humans Homo habilis, meaning handyman. Until now, the evidence suggested this talent emerged about two-and-a-half-million years ago, but now anthropologists have found stone tools way older than that. The tools are now in a museum in Nairobi where team leader Sonia Harmand of Stony Brook University explained that at first they didn't quite know what they had.
SONIA HARMAND: We were very, very excited.
JOYCE: But unaware that these tools were 3.3 million years old, which is hundreds of thousands of years before humans evolved from their ape-like ancestors. Another member of the Stony Brook team, Jason Lewis, says once they did confirm that this assemblage of stones was indeed that old, they knew they had to prove they were actually tools crafted by hand and not just banged-up rocks.
JASON LEWIS: We very quickly had to put our nose to the grind stone to put everything together to convince the rest of the world.
JOYCE: As they report in the journal Nature, what convinced the team was the fact that there was a whole stone-tool-making kit right there in one place. It was just like the ones the first humans used - big core stones and flat anvil stones and sharp flakes. To make a tool, you hold the core stone on the anvil stone and strike it with another rock. What breaks off are sharp flakes. And it was clear from marks on these stones that that's what was done. And the team found lots of those sharp flakes. These could've been used to cut meat off of bone or cut up vegetable matter.
In all, they found over 140 tool-making artifacts in one site. So who made these tools? Certainly chimpanzees can use stones as tools to break up nuts, for example, but they don't manufacture them. The Stony Brook team suspects it was an ape-like creature called Australopithecus. The famed creature Lucy was one such. About four feet tall, they lived both in trees and on land. But even if humans can no longer lay claim to inventing stone tools, it's worth looking at whether tool-making would have been a regular part of the Australopithecus skill set.
ERIN MARIE WILLIAMS-HATALA: The question, I think, is not could they have, but would they have done so repeatedly?
JOYCE: Erin Marie Williams-Hatala is a paleoanthropologist at Chatham University in Pittsburgh. She says the hands and wrists of an Australopithecus were adapted to grasping tree branches - long fingers and a slender thumb - not great for making tools. Williams-Hatala says sure, maybe they could do it, but it would've been a chore.
WILLIAMS-HATALA: And maybe that's because it took them so long to do it that it just didn't make sense for their subsistence strategy - for the way that they lived their lives.
JOYCE: So being able to make tools doesn't mean they became a regular part of the Australopithecus lifestyle. That probably didn't happen until the first human hands evolved with a big, strong thumb and more motor control.
WILLIAMS-HATALA: When our hands and wrists changed to a sufficient degree, it began to make sense for our ancestors to engage in these behaviors in a new way and probably more frequently...
JOYCE: ...To the point where making good tools gave humans an edge in the fight for survival. Christopher Joyce, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.
300x250 Ad
300x250 Ad