One of the more unattractive aspects of Washington life is the growth industry called line sitting. That is, rich lobbyists, lawyers and contractors pay someone to hold a place in line so the payer can get a much-in-demand seat at a Supreme Court argument or a congressional hearing. Now the U.S. Supreme Court has quietly struck one small blow for equality on that front. It has amended its rules to require that there are no sitters on the special line reserved for members of the Supreme Court bar.
Being a member of the High Court bar sounds more glamorous than it is. Basically, you just have to be a lawyer in good standing for three years and pay a $200 fee. But there are a few privileges, and one of them is that members of the Supreme Court bar stand in a separate, and much shorter, admission line than the general public. On those days when seats for a Supreme Court argument are the hottest tickets in town, that really pays off.
For the biggest cases though, even that separate line can be a long one. This year, for the same-sex marriage argument, some lawyers camped out overnight, instead of lining up at the usual 6 a.m. to ensure admittance. And some paid to have others camp out overnight for them. Indeed, there are actual line sitting businesses in Washington.
Most of the line sitting, however, occurs on the public line, which typically is far longer than the so-called "lawyer line" on big days. Slate reported a couple of years ago that it cost $6,000 to guarantee admittance through the public line at an earlier same-sex marriage argument.
This apparently has not gone unnoticed by the justices, and this week the court issued a new rule banning the practice of line sitting, but only for the bar line. Not for the public line.
The thinking appears to be that members of the Supreme Court bar are officers of the court, and thus, that they are subject to the rules of the court, while members of the general public are not subject to those rules when they are outside the courtroom.
Still, the court's website tries to discourage the line-sitting practice for the public, too. "Please do not hold a space in ... line for others who have not yet arrived," it says.
True, that polite request is routinely ignored. But the new language for the lawyers line is not a request. It's a rule, and presumably those who ignore it, do so at their peril.
Transcript
ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:
In Austin, you can pay someone to wait in line for you at a barbecue joint. In Washington, D.C., you pay someone to wait in line for you at the U.S. Supreme Court. Rich lawyers and lobbyists have been doing that for years. Today the justices said no more - but just to the lawyers. NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports.
NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: The so-called lawyer's line is far shorter than the public line, and that pays off on days when seats for a Supreme Court argument are the hottest tickets in town. But even that separate line can be a long one for the biggest cases. Instead of lining up at the usual 6 a.m. to ensure admittance for this year's same-sex marriage case, some lawyers camped out overnight, and some paid to have others do it for them. Indeed, there are actual businesses that arrange for such sitters. Most of the line sitting, however, occurs on the public line which is typically far longer than the lawyers' line on big days. Slate.com reported a couple of years ago that it cost $6,000 to guarantee admittance through the public line at an earlier same-sex marriage argument. This apparently has not gone unnoticed by the justices, and this week the court issued a new rule banning the practice of line sitting, but only for the bar line, not for the public line. The thinking appears to be that members of the Supreme Court Bar are officers of the courts and thus that they're subject to the rules of the court while members of the general public are not. Nina Totenberg, NPR News, Washington. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.
300x250 Ad
300x250 Ad