The 2016 campaign strikes some as a school yard brawl, with candidates calling each other “liars” and accusing each other of not telling the truth.

Jill Lepore, a Harvard history professor, wrote about the subject for The New Yorker. She says attacks about candidates credibility have occurred since the United States started holding elections. However, the candidates didn’t attack one another, their supporters did “the dirty work.”

But Lepore says there are concerning differences about this presidential election.

“I find it concerning that so much of what is described as debate…is really combat,” Lepore told Here & Nows Robin Young. “And combat has a really different history and very different origins than debate. And combat isn’t that useful in a democracy. In fact, it rewards the mighty. It doesn’t  promote the idea of equality.”

Guest

  • Jill Lepore, history professor at Harvard and staff writer at The New Yorker.
Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit NPR.

300x250 Ad

Support quality journalism, like the story above, with your gift right now.

Donate