Watchdog Report Shows Gaps In Information About Afghanistan War

As the U.S. sends thousands more troops to Afghanistan and ratchets up airstrikes, a new report from a U.S. military auditor suggests that the war is still at a stalemate, with signs of continued decline in Afghan government control.

And the amount of basic information available to the public about the war is getting smaller, making it more difficult for the U.S. taxpayer to understand how U.S.-supported forces are faring in their fight against the Taliban.

"The information that's being withheld the last three months is information we have reported on sometimes going back to 10 years," John F. Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghan Reconstruction, tells Morning Edition. "So for 10 years this information was O.K. to tell the American people, the American taxpayer. But for some reason, the last two quarters ... we have been unable to report it to the American people."

The Pentagon continues to withhold facts such as the number of Afghan troops that have died and the number of the Afghan forces that have received training. This information was also not included in the report last quarter from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction — which was set up by Congress to audit U.S. spending in the country's longest-running war.

Congress has authorized these Afghan forces to receive $4.9 billion this fiscal year, and has appropriated $120.8 billion for Afghanistan reconstruction since 2002.

The report also does not include perhaps the most concrete indicator of the war's progress – a breakdown of which districts and populations the Afghan government controls compared to insurgents.

At NPR's request prior to the report's release, the Department of Defense did release the district information, showing that government control has slightly declined.

"As of October 2017, approximately 56% of the country's 407 districts are under Afghan government control or influence, 30% remain contested, and approximately 14% are now under insurgent control or influence," said Navy Capt. Tom Gresback, a U.S. military spokesman.

That means the Afghan government controls or influences about 1 percentage point fewer of the districts compared to the last quarter, and insurgents control or influence about 1 percentage point more.

Gresback stated that SIGAR labeled this information "incorrectly." SIGAR spokesperson Philip LaVelle provided a screen shot of a directive from the DoD that instructed that the information was not releasable to the public. It's not clear why the information wasn't released in the report, in what SIGAR described as a "worrisome development."

"When you needlessly conceal information from people, I think people are concerned and get suspicious that maybe it's worse than we are being told," Sopko said. "And I can't comment, obviously, because it's classified, but that is the problem when you overclassify and needlessly classify information, it leads to suspicion."

He added: "The enemy knows what districts they control, the enemy knows what the situation is. The Afghan military knows what the situation is. The only people who don't know what's going on are the people who are paying for it, and that's the American taxpayer."

"There clearly is a tension right now between SIGAR and the U.S. military ... about access to data," said Seth Jones, the director of the Transnational Threats Project at the Center for Strategic & International Studies. "I don't remember seeing in a SIGAR report this amount of angst."

Data compiled by SIGAR over the past two years shows a slow and steady drop in the amount of territory under Afghan government control. For example, the number of districts controlled or influenced by the government is 16 percent fewer than in November 2015, according to the report and the data provided separately by the Pentagon.

In Helmand Province, historically the most deadly province for U.S. and Afghan troops, six of the 15 districts are being controlled by the Taliban, with another six being contested, an Afghan military source tells NPR.

There's a similar story in the data breaking down which side controls the most people. In August 2016 the Afghan government controlled or influenced 69 percent of the population compared to 9 percent under insurgent control or influence. The top commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan released data in a press briefing in November that showed government control has slipped 5 percentage points from August 2016 and insurgent control is up 3 percentage points.

That's despite a clear recent increase in U.S. and Coalition air strikes – although the total number of strikes was classified for the first time this quarter, according to the report.

The report says NATO's Afghanistan Mission said 4,474 civilian casualties occurred between June 1, 2017, and November 27, 2017 — "of which approximately one-third were deaths and two-thirds were injuries." That's about 13 percent higher than the same period last year, the watchdog says.

In August, President Trump announced a new Afghanistan strategy, committing more troops to the war with no timetable. Recent troop commitments will bring the number of U.S. service members in the country to about 15,000.

Jones says it's probably too soon for that strategy to show an effect on the ground. He adds that there's another major blind spot when it comes to gauging how the war is going: data on the Taliban.

"No one has data, really, on how the Taliban is performing, what its casualty rates are, and a range of information like that," he said. "We only have one side, and we don't even have complete understanding of that side anyway."

Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.